Three baylor regents fire back at briles, alleging he knew about wrongdoing by football players – houston chronicle

Three Baylor University regents who former football coach Art Briles sued for supposedly conspiring to destroy his reputation and keep him from getting another job fired back Thursday with a legal blast of their own that spells out in detail why they believe he had to be fired.

The regents say that Briles and others on his staff not only knew more than they admitted about sexual assault allegations and other wrongdoing involving football players, but attempted to protect the players while showing little concern for the law or potential victims.

That along with Title IX compliance shortcomings Baylor was experiencing on a larger scale eventually led to numerous reports of sexual assaults and other misconduct involving football players being mishandled or not reported to appropriate school personnel, the defendants claim.

Their response provides specific cases in support of a general and hard-hitting critique that was outlined as Baylor’s sexual assault scandal exploded last year. Paving expert forum It contains repeated instances in which players were insulated from the normal campus judicial process and received minimal punishment, if that, and little supervision by members of the athletics department.

In the case of football player Tevin Elliott, for example, the defendants claim that Briles personally intervened after the defensive lineman had been ruled ineligible for the 2011 season because of two Honor Code violations. Facebook search for people without logging in Elliott did not appeal his suspension by the deadline to do so, but two months later Briles asked university president Ken Starr for a chance to do so.

After reading a letter of appeal written on Elliott’s behalf, Starr overturned the suspension, then left it to the athletics department to supervise terms of his scholastic probation. Facebook live from computer Elliott soon was caught cheating again, yet nothing happened. Small front porch designs He remained on the team and played.

In September, a few days after a game with Rice University, Elliott was accused of physical assault by a female student from another school. Pavestone play sand As a result, Baylor’s Office of Judicial Affairs placed him on disciplinary probation. Drip drop taemin mp3 Briles kept him on the team and he continued to play for the rest of the season, the court filing says.

In April 2012, two women accused Elliott of rape in separate incidents. Auburn softball camp Briles was notified by an assistant coach after the second assault, who texted him at one point that it appeared the Waco Police Department would likely charge him.

Elliott was not removed from the team, nor was the Judicial Affairs office told of the charges. Small garden design ideas After a local newspaper reporter inquired about Elliott’s status 10 days later, he was finally put on indefinite suspension. Facebook live for android In May he was kicked out of school. Softball savings Weeks before his trial, Elliott texted Briles and asked him to testify on his behalf.

As it turned out, Elliott also had been accused of two other sexual assaults while at Baylor, in 2009 and 2011, though it is unclear how much the athletic department knew about them at the time. Espn fantasy football draft rankings Convicted of his last known assault, he is serving a 20-year prison sentence.

There were several reports of gang rapes involving football players during Briles’ tenure. Football rankings The earliest surfaced in 2013, with the victim herself a Baylor athlete. Espn fantasy football app When informed of the allegations, the women’s coach went to Briles. Frances bean cobain age He showed him a list of the players the victim had identified.

In releasing details that they insist show indifference to victims, school rules, and criminal laws, the regents are challenging a narrative pushed by Shillinglaw, Briles, and some athletic boosters that the football program was made a scapegoat for broad institutional problems of compliance with provisions of Title IX, a federal law that protects victims of sexual harassment or violence on campus.

Briles’ lawsuit, filed about six months after he was removed as the sexual assault scandal reached a crescendo, claimed that he was a “hard-working, productive football coach at the amazing Baylor University” who became the victim of “power games played by … the defendants in this case … who orchestrated the nefarious process of his termination.”

Citing the extensive outside investigation done by Philadelphia law firm Pepper Hamilton at the behest of the university, the defendants describe an approach to discipline and accountability by Briles and his staff that is damning even without considering the instances of sexual violence. Baseball america top 100 prospects 2016 It was the protection of players that led to much of the bad publicity, not the failure of school officials outside the athletics department and certainly not the actions which regents felt compelled to make, they said.

“Shillinglaw’s present difficulties are of his own doing, not the result of anything the Baylor regents have done,” their response states. Rawlings “The football program was a black hole into which reports of misconduct such as drug use, physical assault, domestic violence, brandishing of guns, indecent exposure, and academic fraud disappeared.”

With numerous lawsuits pending in various jurisdictions – both federal and state – the Baylor rape scandal promises to remain a dark cloud over the nation’s largest Baptist college for the foreseeable future. Drip coffee grind Shillinglaw’s suit was the second filed within the last week.

Briles lawyer said he dropped his suit in order to move on, fearful that lawyers were going to bury him in legal costs, that he now only wanted “peace in his life” and distance between his family and the school he had put on the football map with a string of winning seasons.

Houston attorney Rusty Hardin, lead counsel for the three Baylor regents, said the message they are trying to get out is that the board of regents had no choice but to clean house as the scandal gained national headlines, starting with Briles.

“Basically decent people did things that were insensitive and unfair to portions of their student body,” Hardin said of the school officials that were at the heart of the scandal. Polyester fabric “The corrections have been made by the board of regents and are on the way. Pixel pitch I hope our response to these lawsuits will put to bed claims they were overreacting. Landscape ontario jobs These regents had absolutely no choice.”

Hardin praised Baylor’s board of regents for what he said is an unprecedented willingness to accept the school’s failure to do right by women who were making complaints of sexual and physical assault.

“No university in the history of this country has ever so dramatically confronted changes that had to be made,” Hardin said. Small garden design plans “You know how this often happens: School administrators hunker down and fight it and hope it goes away. Softball camps Or they throw some money at plaintiffs. College softball scores Baylor went much further than anyone has ever gone.”

Thursday’s response to Shillinglaw’s suit challenges the claims of many of Baylor’s athletic supporters who have blamed regents and the Pepper Hamilton law firm for reacting unfairly or sloppily. Fantasy football news It offers specific factual details that the regents claim demonstrates why they believed he had to be fired.

“When Coach Briles, Shillinglaw or others were alerted to misconduct, they routinely did not report these incidents to University officials outside the football program … Briles, Shillinglaw, and others set up a structure within football that often insulated Briles from knowing about misconduct.”

When Briles did learn of particular problems, he encouraged Shillinglaw and others on his staff to keep them inside the program and not alert other campus authorities, the defendants’ answer said, adding that Briles did not pursue information from players who had been accused of a gang rape, or report the allegations to other school authorities.

Briles was removed in May 2016 after an independent review by Pepper Hamilton found instances of sexual violence involving Baylor football players and myriad problems within the athletics program and the school as a whole in how it dealt with laws to protect victims and to create a safer environment for students.

Briles denied doing anything wrong, asserting “I’ve never done anything illegal, immoral, unethical.” He claimed to have been unaware of the assault allegations when they were made or of the attempts by others within the athletics administration to protect the players and the football team.